80 years of excellence explore the mapei world.
Colorado carpet installation v palermo.
Palermo 647 p 2d 686 colo app 1982.
Palermo 668 p 2d 1384 1983 this opinion cites 18 cases.
Palermo 647 p 2d 686 1982 33 ucc rep serv.
The court of appeals in reversing the trial court held that an oral agreement involving the purchase and installation of carpeting and other flooring materials was a contract for the sale of.
Colorado carpet installation inc.
Electro flo corporation a corporation and ashley l.
Mapei is a leading company in the field of adhesives sealants and chemical products for building.
The court of appeals in reversing the trial court held that an oral agreement involving the purchase and installation of carpeting and other flooring materials was a contract for the sale of.
Cases that cite this headnote 6 frauds statute of nature of contract contract furnishing installed carpeting primary purpose of which was sale of goods rather than rendering of services in installation of carpeting came within statute of frauds and without a writing.
Palermo 647 p 2d 686 brought to you by free law project a non profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in colorado carpet installation inc.
Palermo 647 p 2d 686 colo app 1982.
Issue 2 argument for colorado carpet installation inc supplemented with information about general background law concerning the specially manufactured goods exception to the statute of frauds in the ucc.
Opinion for colorado carpet installation v.
Colorado carpet installation inc.
Palermo 647 p 2d 686 colo app 1982.
Aluminum company of america v.
Fred palermo and zuma palermo.
We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in colorado carpet installation inc.
Robison 451 f 2d 1115 1971 tenth circuit tuesday november 30 1971 cited 2 times.
473 c r s 1973 4 2 201 4 2 201 3 a.
647 p 2d 686 1982 colorado carpet installation inc d b a sierra range carpets inc a colorado corporation plaintiff appellee v.
The court of appeals in reversing the trial court held that an oral agreement involving the purchase and installation of carpeting and other flooring materials was a contract for the sale of goods within the meaning of section 4.